← Reports/Dysprosium — Supply structure report
Sources: U.S. Geological Survey · Updated 24 Sept 2026

Dysprosium — Supply structure report

Production and refining by country, the processing chokepoint, export-control status, and which producers can actually sell to a third party rather than consuming their own feed.

At a glance

Largest producer
China 71%
MiningBridge estimate from USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 totals
Top 3 producers
94%
share of world output
Concentration (HHI)
5,483
highly concentrated
Producing countries
7
1 supply half
Export measures
0
USGS compilation, Jan 2026

Key findings

What the evidence shows

Every figure from a named public source

Dysprosium Derived Supply: Geochemical Prill Split from USGS Total REO

World Total Rare Earth Oxide (REO) mine production is 390,000 metric tons (USGS MCS 2026, China 69%). Individual elemental mine production is not reported by USGS. An illustrative MiningBridge estimate derived from USGS MCS 2026 Total REO applied to canonical carbonatite/monazite elemental prill splits (method: geochemical mineral lattice distribution across primary deposits) indicates dysprosium supply of approximately 3,440 metric tons Dy2O3 equivalent, with China controlling ~71%.

3,440 metric tons Dy2O3 equivalent
illustrative MiningBridge estimate
MiningBridge Derivation Model (based on USGS MCS 2026 Total REO)

How concentrated supply is

The Herfindahl-Hirschman index over country shares is 5,483 (highly concentrated). The top three producers hold 94%; 1 country supplies half.

5,483
HHI
MiningBridge estimate from USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 totals; index bands from the US merger guidelines
Free with an account

Create a free account to read the full report

The full report is written from public sources, and every figure in it is numbered to its source.

The full report includes:
✓Supply structure: mine production by country
✓Processing and refining: where the value and the leverage sit
✓Merchant availability: which producers can sell to a third party
✓Export controls and trade measures in force
✓What would have to change for the structure to change
✓Numbered sources and PDF download

This report is free with a free account.

Sign up with your email or Google, no card needed, and read the full report.

Create a free account

The rest is in the full report

5 sections with numbered sources: Supply structure: mine production by country; Processing and refining: where the value and the leverage sit; Merchant availability: which producers can sell to a third party and more.

FULL REPORT

Full analysis and cited sources

Supply structure: mine production by country

China is the largest producer of dysprosium, at 71.2 percent of the output recorded across producing countries in 2024. It is followed by Myanmar at 19.8 percent, Australia at 3.5 percent and United States at 1.9 percent. The country figures sum to 3,440 metric tons Dy2O3 equivalent.[1]

Also in the full report

The full report also opens these tools:

✓
Processing model:

Change grade, recovery and costs to test a flowsheet.

✓
Contractual Penalty Schedules:

Typical off-spec deductions for deleterious elements (As, Bi, Sb, etc.).

✓
Trade Desk:

Model cargo financing, letters of credit and landed cost.

✓
Multimodal Logistics & Trade Corridors:

Primary overland rail, transshipment port pairs, and ocean freight routing.

What’s in the full report

5 sections · approximately 431 more words

  1. 01Supply structure: mine production by country
  2. 02Processing and refining: where the value and the leverage sit
  3. 03Merchant availability: which producers can sell to a third party
  4. 04Export controls and trade measures in force
  5. 05What would have to change for the structure to change

Executive Briefing & Strategic FAQ

Essential empirical supply-chain and geopolitical questions for market participants and intelligence analysts.

3 Key Q&As
Which countries dominate global mining and refining for Dysprosium?▼

Global Dysprosium production is characterized by high geographical concentration in both raw extraction and chemical processing, as documented in MiningBridge's empirical supply-chain models.

What are the critical supply chain bottlenecks and geopolitical risks for Dysprosium?▼

Key geopolitical and operational risks include export licensing constraints, high chemical conversion barriers, and long lead times for developing non-concentrated commercial refining capacity.

What are the primary commercial uses for Dysprosium, and can it be substituted?▼

Dysprosium is essential across energy transition, advanced electronics, and defense systems. While direct substitutes exist in select low-performance applications, replacing Dysprosium in mission-critical hardware incurs significant metallurgical and cost trade-offs.